接近した日本が悪いって言いたいらしいけど、それとレーダー当てたかは関係なくないか 反論動画で韓国はロックオンしてませんって言っているのか？ 0225名無しさん＠１周年2019/01/08(火) 10:56:00.34ID:JlD8rp8o0 ×日本語仕方ない ○日本語しか 0226名無しさん＠１周年2019/01/08(火) 10:56:46.29ID:mlpDVUiQ0>>224 全く反論になってないよ とにかくギャーギャー喚いてるだけ、まあ韓国人らしいといえばらしいんだけど 0227名無しさん＠１周年2019/01/08(火) 11:02:45.16ID:UEtD5GK/0 しかし、今回の件についた未だになにも発言しないムン。 0228名無しさん＠１周年2019/01/08(火) 11:10:47.46ID:VWyObR450 Japan South Korea video wars https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s18v3oxtxtc0229名無しさん＠１周年2019/01/08(火) 11:12:46.02ID:VWyObR450 Recently in the Sea of Japan, a South Korean Coast Guard vessel and a South Korean naval vessel the Gwanggaeto the great destroyer DDH 971, attempting to rescue a stranded North Korean fishing vessel. A nice gesture by the South Koreans.
According to the Japanese this was taking place within their EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone). Resulting in Japan sending a Maritime Self Defense Force aircraft, a Kawasaki P-1 to investigate. While the P-1 was on scene, the South Korean destroyer engaged their Fire Control Radar lock on the Japanese P-1.
By all international standards the Japanese could have responded by firing at the vessel, but did not. Then the Japanese attempted to radio the South Korean vessel on a few different frequencies. The South Koreans did not respond which could have escalated the situation. However the Japanese left the area to avoid any hostile activity.
The Japanese released a video taken from their Kawasaki P-1 of the incident. It shows six times the Japanese communicating in English to the Korean destroyer, all ignored.
The South Koreans in their video explanation claims it was difficult to understand what the Japanese were communicating. Huh? A South Korean destroyers sees a military aircraft of an allied nation flying overhead, and they ignore repeated communication request? An honorable act would have been to radio the Japanese aircraft stating their communications were not legible.
The uniform military of both nations are honorable people. Thus the speculation it was the “suits,” civilian employees, overseers, and bureaucrats who might have come up with that ignorant excuse. 0230名無しさん＠１周年2019/01/08(火) 11:17:38.44ID:t1hI2MYi0>>229 suits,、つまり文大統領ですね 0231名無しさん＠１周年2019/01/08(火) 11:20:57.23ID:9bvEvu4K0 【ネトウヨが意図的に無視する日本の問題点】 ・ただの自衛官が暴走し憲法違反の存在である日本の「海軍」を名乗ったこと ・度重なる哨戒機の異常な低空飛行の意図を日本が頑なに説明しないこと ・レーダー照射されてるはずなのに回避せず何度も哨戒機がウロウロしていたこと ・ほとんど協議の間もなく一方的な見解をメディアリークし国際問題化したこと（政治利用） ・人道的な救助活動の妨害を謝罪せず論点のずれた反論をしていること ・韓国の反論動画の方が再生数が多く国際世論は韓国寄りであること
