Paul Krugman Reminds Us of the Context of Keynes's "Bury Banknotes in the Ground and Dig Them Up" Discussion http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/08/paul-krugman-reminds-us-of-the-context-of-keyness-bury-banknotes-in-the-ground-and-dig-them-up-discussion.html General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money: If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again… the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is.
[New York Times]August 15, 2011 10:58 am August 15, 2011 10:58 am Oh! What A Lovely War! http://cache.yahoofs.jp/search/cache?c=kqn6gu1UBbAJ&;p=krugman+Keyne+Roosevelt+war&u=https%3A%2F%2Fkrugman.blogs.nytimes.com%2F2011%2F08%2F15%2Foh-what-a-lovely-war%2F World War II is the great natural experiment in the effects of large increases in government spending, and as such has always served as an important positive example for those of us who favor an activist approach to a depressed economy. Christy Romer is very much on the same wavelength. 0669名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:08:21.06ID:xA/J0+So0>>632 そんなもの買う必要が無いからだろ 0670名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:08:21.08ID:iOGuj72t0>>651 下層が税金を払ってないから破綻するんだわ 0671名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:08:22.94ID:p6qcCwyd0>>645 金融緩和の一番の目的は、利払い費を減らすこと、 そして、歳入のこと考えずに、予算を拡大できること 副次的に、金利下げることによる自国通貨安 しかし、ハードクラッシュすれば、ロシアみたいに年利12％ぐらいには簡単になる 0672名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:08:23.28ID:XzHh7KII0 ろくに働かない癖に給料上がる訳ないだろ。何が働き方改革だよ。休み増やして給料上がるかよ。ｸｽﾞども 0673名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:08:35.32ID:mXzuzKkE0 そろそろ崩れて円高に傾きそうだな さて危機を感じる賢い俺様は 冷静に対処しよう(笑) 0674名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:08:39.97ID:928foC0A0>>634 そのモデルを５年続けた結果が今の現状なんだが 0675名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:08:44.06ID:31g/UbhW0>>646 じゃあ、そういう人材派遣とかやってるやつに もっと豪遊してもらえるように安倍が頼むしかないんじゃね？ そういう人が金をどこかに･･･どうやってどこにやるのか知らんけどさ どっかに金が消えてるから問題なんだよ 0676名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:08:55.56ID:tSGuEcxf0>>653 戦争になった訳だ 0677名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:09:08.77ID:qf0wWX8P0>>617 だから安倍のやってることは円安・株高の為替操作だ罠
ネトサポのアホはわかってないようだが 0678名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:09:09.06ID:LiX1QhCL0 ちべらるノニューヨークタイムズのニュースを見てないわけ？ 日本人は全員ネトウヨｗ 日本のマスコミもネトウヨｗｗｗ [New York Times]November 8, 2008 3:37 pm New Deal economics https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/08/new-deal-economics/?mtrref=search.yahoo.co.jp&;gwh=B2961B073FEC17F9F931637735322105&gwt=pay&assetType=opinion Everybody’s talking new New Deal these days — and, predictably, the FDR-haters are out in force, with all the usual claims about FDR having actually made the Great Depression worse. (To the right, way back when, FDR was “That Man.” Now Obama is “that one.” Interesting.)
The received wisdom is that FDR's Keynesian policies didn't really fix the Depression at all; that had to wait till the War took over and restored economic activity. Well, will someone tell me just how the War was different from Keynesian spending? Oh, sure, Keynes didn't want to kill millions of people and lay waste to whole provinces of Europe, I know that. But economically, setting aside that sort of moralistic value judgment, what did the war bring about? 0679名無しさん＠１周年2018/01/13(土) 15:09:09.42ID:mxLYuwXv0 ★
