ニューヨークタイムズに連載中のノーベル経済学賞のクルーグマンは、君たちと正反対の主張をしまくっているけどwww さらに。このニュース自体いろいろ間違えている。 オバマ時代に、too little too lateとstimulusについてクルーグマンは主張し続けた。 ”共和党は”「財政破綻するとかインフレとかいろいろな理由で」この緩和策に反対していた。 ニュース見てないの?wwwニュース見てないとネトウヨらしいぜwww ニューヨークタイムズもクルーグマンもリベラル派なんだけどwww
Paul Krugman JAN. 8, 2009 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/opinion/09krugman.html “I don’t believe it’s too late to change course, but it will be if we don’t take dramatic action as soon as possible. If nothing is done, this recession could linger for years.”
Paul Krugman: Stimulus Was ‘Too Little,’ And Now It’s Almost All Gone 08/30/2013 01:51 pm ET | Updated Dec 06, 2017 https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/30/paul-krugman-stimulus_n_3844394.html We never spent all that much money on President Obama’s stimulus, and now we’re spending almost nothing on it, and that’s a shame, according to Paul Krugman.
Stimulus arithmetic (wonkish but important)January 6, 2009 9:26 am https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/stimulus-arithmetic-wonkish-but-important/ Bit by bit we’re getting information on the Obama stimulus plan, enough to start making back-of-the-envelope estimates of impact. 0847名無しさん@1周年2018/01/14(日) 18:53:18.06ID:/t9lIXyOO>>828 わかってくれるか。 0848名無しさん@1周年2018/01/14(日) 18:53:21.94ID:8koNEsZg0 ネトサポは経済疎いみたいだから教えてやる
Paul Krugman Reminds Us of the Context of Keynes's "Bury Banknotes in the Ground and Dig Them Up" Discussion http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/08/paul-krugman-reminds-us-of-the-context-of-keyness-bury-banknotes-in-the-ground-and-dig-them-up-discussion.html General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money: If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again… the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is. 0853名無しさん@1周年2018/01/14(日) 18:54:14.88ID:8koNEsZg0>>845 そうだよ? 売り上げ台数って日本国内で生産し、日本で販売されてる台数なの? 0854名無しさん@1周年2018/01/14(日) 18:54:28.95ID:c3//sqoT0 【青森】高齢者宅の雪下ろしボランティア ポイントが溜まります 1時間1ポイント(100円相当)★3 https://asahi.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/newsplus/1515891358/
好景気っすなぁw 0855名無しさん@1周年2018/01/14(日) 18:54:41.21ID:lNxsDP9T0 New York Times]August 15, 2011 10:58 am August 15, 2011 10:58 am Oh! What A Lovely War! http://cache.yahoofs.jp/search/cache?c=kqn6gu1UBbAJ&p=krugman+Keyne+Roosevelt+war&u=https%3A%2F%2Fkrugman.blogs.nytimes.com%2F2011%2F08%2F15%2Foh-what-a-lovely-war%2F World War II is the great natural experiment in the effects of large increases in government spending, and as such has always served as an important positive example for those of us who favor an activist approach to a depressed economy. Christy Romer is very much on the same wavelength.
[New York Times]November 8, 2008 New Deal economics https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/08/new-deal-economics/?mtrref=search.yahoo.co.jp&gwh=B2961B073FEC17F9F931637735322105&gwt=pay&assetType=opinion Everybody’s talking new New Deal these days - and, predictably, the FDR-haters are out in force, with all the usual claims about FDR having actually made the Great Depression worse. (To the right, way back when, FDR was “That Man.” Now Obama is “that one.” Interesting.)
The received wisdom is that FDR's Keynesian policies didn't really fix the Depression at all; that had to wait till the War took over and restored economic activity. Well, will someone tell me just how the War was different from Keynesian spending? Oh, sure, Keynes didn't want to kill millions of people and lay waste to whole provinces of Europe, I know that. But economically, setting aside that sort of moralistic value judgment, what did the war bring about?