トランプ大統領は、お気に入りのメディア媒体であるツイッター(Twitter)を通じて、所属する共和党のウェブサイトに掲載された「フェイクニュース賞」1〜10位を発表。受賞者リストにはCNNテレビ、ワシントン・ポスト(Washington Post)、ニューヨーク・タイムズ(New York Times)など、日ごろトランプ氏の怒りの矛先が向けられている米主要メディアの名が並んだ。
選出基準は「最も間違いが多く、偏向した主要メディア」とトランプ氏が認めたものだ。
1位に選ばれたのは、記者ではなく、ニューヨーク・タイムズにコラムを連載中の経済学者ポール・クルーグマン(Paul Krugman)氏だった。ノーベル経済学賞(Nobel Prize in Economics)受賞者のクルーグマン氏は、米大統領選の結果を受け、リアリティー番組の人気司会者だったトランプ氏は経済政策に関しては未熟で、弱った世界経済にさらなるダメージを与える予測不可能なリスクがあると指摘。「経済は絶対に回復しない」と記していた。
トランプ氏はフェイクニュース賞を発表した後、ツイッターに「間違いだらけでいい加減な報道もあるが、私が尊敬する素晴らしい記者も大勢いるし、米国人が誇れる『グッドニュース』もたくさんある!」と投稿。「皆で力を合わせれば克服できないものはない──偏向しまくったメディアでさえも。米国を再び偉大な国にしよう!(We ARE Making America Great Again!)」などと呼び掛けた。(c)AFP/Emma CHARLTON
John Maynard Keynes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes The advent of the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 caused a resurgence in Keynesian thought. Keynesian economics provided the theoretical underpinning for economic policies undertaken in response to the crisis by President Barack Obama of the United States, Prime Minister Gordon Brown of the United Kingdom, and other heads of governments.[ 0271名無しさん@1周年2018/01/19(金) 11:58:51.53ID:WMfG8NuD0>>78クルーグマンと同じく「金融緩和でデフレ脱却」とかほざいてたリフレ派経済学者の代表的人物 嘘を書くな
Paul Krugman JAN. 8, 2009 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/opinion/09krugman.html “I don’t believe it’s too late to change course, but it will be if we don’t take dramatic action as soon as possible. If nothing is done, this recession could linger for years.”
Paul Krugman: Stimulus Was ‘Too Little,’ And Now It’s Almost All Gone 08/30/2013 01:51 pm ET | Updated Dec 06, 2017 https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/30/paul-krugman-stimulus_n_3844394.html We never spent all that much money on President Obama’s stimulus, and now we’re spending almost nothing on it, and that’s a shame, according to Paul Krugman.
Stimulus arithmetic (wonkish but important)January 6, 2009 9:26 am https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/stimulus-arithmetic-wonkish-but-important/ Bit by bit we’re getting information on the Obama stimulus plan, enough to start making back-of-the-envelope estimates of impact. 0272名無しさん@1周年2018/01/19(金) 12:00:06.77ID:WMfG8NuD0>>78クルーグマンと同じく「金融緩和でデフレ脱却」とかほざいてたリフレ派経済学者の代表的人物 嘘を書くな
Paul Krugman Reminds Us of the Context of Keynes's "Bury Banknotes in the Ground and Dig Them Up" Discussion http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/08/paul-krugman-reminds-us-of-the-context-of-keyness-bury-banknotes-in-the-ground-and-dig-them-up-discussion.html General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money: If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again… the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is. 0275名無しさん@1周年2018/01/19(金) 12:01:15.69ID:KBsTytAH0 なんか勘違いしてるのがいるけど、 トランプのは大企業減税+規制緩和であって、 単なる古典的自由主義者だぞ。 それで景気回復してるなら経済統制が間違いってことよ。 0276名無しさん@1周年2018/01/19(金) 12:02:08.18ID:WMfG8NuD0 [New York Times]August 15, 2011 10:58 am August 15, 2011 10:58 am Oh! What A Lovely War! http://cache.yahoofs.jp/search/cache?c=kqn6gu1UBbAJ&p=krugman+Keyne+Roosevelt+war&u=https%3A%2F%2Fkrugman.blogs.nytimes.com%2F2011%2F08%2F15%2Foh-what-a-lovely-war%2F World War II is the great natural experiment in the effects of large increases in government spending, and as such has always served as an important positive example for those of us who favor an activist approach to a depressed economy. Christy Romer is very much on the same wavelength. 0277名無しさん@1周年2018/01/19(金) 12:02:28.99ID:WMfG8NuD0 [New York Times]November 8, 2008 New Deal economics https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/08/new-deal-economics/?mtrref=search.yahoo.co.jp&gwh=B2961B073FEC17F9F931637735322105&gwt=pay&assetType=opinion Everybody’s talking new New Deal these days - and, predictably, the FDR-haters are out in force, with all the usual claims about FDR having actually made the Great Depression worse. (To the right, way back when, FDR was “That Man.” Now Obama is “that one.” Interesting.)
The received wisdom is that FDR's Keynesian policies didn't really fix the Depression at all; that had to wait till the War took over and restored economic activity. Well, will someone tell me just how the War was different from Keynesian spending? Oh, sure, Keynes didn't want to kill millions of people and lay waste to whole provinces of Europe, I know that. But economically, setting aside that sort of moralistic value judgment, what did the war bring about?
アメリカの軍事費 [Wikipedia] List of countries by past military expenditure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_military_expenditure Figures for the tables below are provided by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) database. They are presented in millions of USD$ in current prices, converted at the exchange rate for the given year.[