アメリカ合衆国の99%に原発は不要! アメリカ合衆国の99%は原発に反対だ! 0611名無しさん@1周年2018/05/27(日) 12:42:05.51ID:peNFbzQq0 [Arms Control Association] Looking Back: The U.S.-Russian Uranium Deal: Results and Lessons https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2013_12/Looking-Back_The-US-Russian-Uranium-Deal-Results-and-Lessons#bio In February 1993, Russia and the United States signed an agreement on the disposition of highly enriched uranium (HEU) extracted from Russian nuclear weapons.[1] The idea was received in the U.S. academic community with great enthusiasm and was supported by the Bush administration in view of the signing in July 1991 of the Soviet-U.S. Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I), which mandated a reduction of the two countries’ nuclear weapons stockpiles by approximately 5,000 warheads apiece.[4]
[Wikipedia] George H. W. Bush https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._W._Bush 41st President of the United States In office January 20, 1989 - January 20, 1993 0612名無しさん@1周年2018/05/27(日) 12:42:07.01ID:P+aL2xNU0 日本だけか ロシアは何するの? 0613名無しさん@1周年2018/05/27(日) 12:42:26.13ID:GSQbuCoR0 北方領土で ウニ養殖とイチゴの温室栽培…首脳会談で合意へ
そんなもん!事務方にーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー任せておけよ!! それより!4島返還はどうなったんだーーーーーーーーーー21回も会談してるのに!! 0614名無しさん@1周年2018/05/27(日) 12:43:37.91ID:peNFbzQq0 [Arms Control Association] Looking Back: The U.S.-Russian Uranium Deal: Results and Lessons https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2013_12/Looking-Back_The-US-Russian-Uranium-Deal-Results-and-Lessons#bio In February 1993, Russia and the United States signed an agreement on the disposition of highly enriched uranium (HEU) extracted from Russian nuclear weapons.[1] Under the terms of the deal, Russia undertook to down-blend 500 tons[2] of HEU, enough to build 20,000 nuclear warheads, over a 20-year period. The two sides agreed that the resulting low-enriched uranium (LEU) would be used as fuel by nuclear power plants in the United States, hence the informal name of the program, “Megatons to Megawatts.”
In January 1994, Russia’s Techsnab-export (Tenex) and the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC), the state-run companies authorized by their respective governments to implement the deal, signed the contract. In the U.S. case, that meant that USEC was a supplier of enriched uranium to private utilities. According to assessments made at the time, the value of the entire program was expected to reach about $12 billion.
Background The idea of down-blending excess stockpiles of weapons HEU and using the resulting LEU as fuel for nuclear power plants was first proposed in 1991 by Thomas Neff, a senior researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Center for International Studies.[3] The idea was received in the U.S. academic community with great enthusiasm and was supported by the Bush administration in view of the signing in July 1991 of the Soviet-U.S. Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I), which mandated a reduction of the two countries’ nuclear weapons stockpiles by approximately 5,000 warheads apiece.[4]
Given the difficult economic situation in the Soviet Union at the time, Moscow expressed interest in Neff’s proposal, which opened up the prospect of billions of U.S. dollars in hard currency earnings being generated as a by-product of implementing START I.
The HEU-LEU agreement differed in an important way from the 1992 Agreement on the Safe and Secure Transportation, Storage and Destruction of Weapons and the Prevention of Weapons Proliferation, which provided the legal framework for the so-called Nunn-Lugar program.
Conclusion In its implementation, the HEU-LEU agreement has become an effective instrument of irreversible nuclear disarmament. Its historic significance becomes clear when one realizes that for the first time, the two nuclear weapons superpowers turned a part of a nuclear weapons arsenal into something the countries really needed: electric power for Americans and money for Russia. The two countries mutually benefited from the deal in terms of increased security, thanks to the reduction of their nuclear material stockpiles.
The economic importance of the HEU-LEU deal for the United States can be illustrated by the following figures: For almost 20 years, LEU supplies under the agreement have accounted for about 50 percent of the nuclear fuel consumed by U.S. nuclear power plants. About 10 percent of U.S. electricity is generated from enriched uranium supplied under the HEU-LEU program. 0615名無しさん@1周年2018/05/27(日) 12:45:03.06ID:peNFbzQq0 君達日本人が本当のことを言っているなら、 日本は自動車を作るのをやめるべき。 日本は、輸出産業中心をやめるべき。
[NewYorker]January 28, 2013 Issue http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/01/28/the-force The Force How much military is enough? Not until the Second World War did the United States establish what would become a standing army. And even that didn’t happen without dissent. In May of 1941, Robert Taft, a Republican senator from Ohio, warned that America’s entry into the Second World War would mean, ultimately, that the United States “will have to maintain a police force perpetually in Germany and throughout Europe.” Taft, like Nye, was an ardent isolationist. “Frankly, the American people don’t want to rule the world, and we are not equipped to do it. Such imperialism is wholly foreign to our ideals of democracy and freedom,” he said. “It is not our manifest destiny or our national destiny.” アメリカ合衆国は、第2次世界大戦まで、常設陸軍を持っていなかった。 第2次世界大戦になっても、反対意見なしに常設陸軍を編成はできなかった。 1941年5月に、オハイオ州からの共和党議員ロバートタフトは、 「アメリカが第2次世界大戦に参戦することは、最終的には、アメリカが、ドイツおよびヨーロッパじゅうに、警察力を永遠に維持することになる」 よ警告した。 タフトは、ナイと同様に、情熱的な、孤立主義者だった。 「率直に言うと、アメリカ人は、世界を征服したいとは思っていないし、それをするだけの軍事力もない」 「そうした帝国主義は、我々の理想とする民主主義と自由からは、最も完全に遠い考え方だ」 彼は、そう言った。 0634名無しさん@1周年2018/05/27(日) 14:31:29.16ID:+VzBGVsN0 ショボ 0635名無しさん@1周年2018/05/27(日) 14:32:23.70ID:xLykP9ci0 なにがウニイチゴだよ安倍 0636(=ФωФ=)保健所愛護センター附属 犬猫惨殺ナチス施設は即時廃絶▼2018/05/27(日) 14:35:01.49ID:8hkTMjhmO . ●悠然と、かつ執拗に、【日本の犬猫ナチス政策・総本山の地位を堅持し続ける環境省】に、【一切の例外なき犬猫セーフティ・ネットの拡大と拡充】を、強大なる人類の差別なき社会的的使命という観点から、これを厳重に要望する