A “disturbing the peace” ordinance passed by a city government prohibited the “assembly of three or more persons, on a city sidewalk, who conduct themselves in such a way that it annoys or disturbs people passing by . . .” A group of friends assembled on a sidewalk that was a major thoroughfare in the downtown business district, and gave impromptu speeches about the need to invest in education. They spoke about the decline in school standards and the resultant “dumbing down” of the country. They were arrested and prosecuted under the ordinance. Their appeals led to challenging the constitutionality of the city ordinance in a federal district court. What is the likely decision of the federal court?
1. The ordinance is constitutional. Cities have a right, in fact, a duty to protect its citizens. Because the friends were disturbing to people on a busy sidewalk, the city had the right to control such disturbances.
2. The ordinance is unconstitutional because it violates the “void for vagueness” doctrine
3. The ordinance is unconstitutional because it denies people who would try to exercise their first amendment right to free speech from receiving due process of law
4. The ordinance is constitutional. It informs people of what is prohibited and where it is prohibited. It informs people that they may not act a certain way that would disturb the public peace. 0754名無しさん@1周年2018/06/29(金) 21:10:43.37ID:ysr9KdU20>>286 やっぱ知的障害ある感じだね 更にメンヘラだし 0755名無しさん@1周年2018/06/29(金) 21:10:50.88ID:Pte2k/CF0>>741 KKみたいにまともじゃない男児がいるって事は、まともじゃない女児もいるって事だよ 人間て上には上も沢山いるけど、下には下も恐ろしい程沢山いるんだよ 0756名無しさん@1周年2018/06/29(金) 21:11:05.42ID:Tj12obXy0>>417 高円宮家は皇室のサッカー担当だから 0757名無しさん@1周年2018/06/29(金) 21:11:05.79ID:w0VcC/7h0>>1 その前に日本で弁護士資格とれよ。 日本より楽な、米国弁護士の資格を取得して誤魔化すつもりか? 0758名無しさん@1周年2018/06/29(金) 21:11:06.71ID:xJykJeWS0 小室さんって、眞子様の御心を惑わす悪魔?