02/21/2017 Alan Greenspan: Ron Paul Was Right About The Gold Standard https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-20/alan-greenspan-ron-paul-was-right-about-gold-standard Going back to his libertarian roots, it was the idea of returning to a gold standard that Greenspan focused on: a gold standard that he said would help mitigate risks of an “unstable fiscal system” like the one we have today. “Today, going back on to the gold standard would be perceived as an act of desperation. But if the gold standard were in place today, we would not have reached the situation in which we now find ourselves,” he said. “[T]here is a widespread view that the 19th Century gold standard didn’t work. I think that’s like wearing the wrong size shoes and saying the shoes are uncomfortable! It wasn’t the gold standard that failed; it was politics.” And the punchline: “We would never have reached this position of extreme indebtedness were we on the gold standard, because the gold standard is a way of ensuring that fiscal policy never gets out of line.” 0461名無しさん@1周年2018/09/01(土) 23:13:00.16ID:+vuqcZKh0 リベラル民主党の方が、金本位制に反対し放漫財政を主張している
[Wikipedia] Trillion dollar coin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trillion_dollar_coin The trillion dollar coin is a concept that emerged during the United States debt-ceiling crisis in 2011, as a proposed way to bypass any necessity for the United States Congress to raise the country's borrowing limit, through the minting of very high-value platinum coins. The concept gained more mainstream attention by late 2012 during the debates over the United States fiscal cliff negotiations and renewed debt-ceiling discussions. After reaching the headlines during the week of January 7, 2013, use of the trillion dollar coin concept was ultimately rejected by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury.[1]
Emergence of the concept The concept gained renewed,[24][25] and more mainstream,[26][27] attention by late 2012 as the debt-ceiling limit was being approached once again. In early January the economist Paul Krugman endorsed the idea[28][29][30] and asserted that opposition to the idea was coming from people unwilling to admit the truth that "money is a social contrivance."[29]
Analysis and reaction[edit] Paul Krugman said "So minting the coin would be undignified, but so what? At the same time, it would be economically harmless ? and would both avoid catastrophic economic developments and help head off government by blackmail." He also declared the trillion dollar coin debate to be "the most important fiscal policy debate of our lifetimes".[50]
29.^ Jump up to: a b Paul Krugman (January 9, 2013). "Barbarous Relics". The New York Times. Retrieved January 19, 2013. 30.Jump up ^ Paul Krugman (January 10, 2013). "Thinking About the Brink". The New York Times. Retrieved January 19, 2013. 32^ who (January 7, 2013), Paul Krugman: Trillion-Dollar Coin A 'Silly But Benign' Debt-Ceiling Fix The Huffington Post 0462名無しさん@1周年2018/09/01(土) 23:13:25.90ID:+vuqcZKh0 だから、じゃあ、中央銀行が無限に紙幣を刷ったらどうなるの? 政府が無限に赤字国債を発行しだしたらどうなるの?
opposition to the idea was coming from people unwilling to admit the truth that "money is a social contrivance."[
"money is a social contrivance." 0463名無しさん@1周年2018/09/01(土) 23:13:44.37ID:+vuqcZKh0 君達がデフレだデフレだ言い続けていたの。 だから、だったら、中央銀行が無限に紙幣を刷ったらいいだろといっただけ。政府が無限に赤字国債を発行しだしたらいいだろ。
opposition to the idea was coming from people unwilling to admit the truth that "money is a social contrivance."[
"money is a social contrivance." 0464名無しさん@1周年2018/09/01(土) 23:15:09.13ID:+vuqcZKh0 サマータイム推進派は、戦前の日本を美化していることになるのもおかしい。 俺は別にサマータイム推進派と言うわけではない。 「お前ら日本人の主張が支離滅裂で、信用に値しないクズ」、なことを証明している。 0465名無しさん@1周年2018/09/01(土) 23:19:42.75ID:+vuqcZKh0 ソフトやプログラミングが原因なら消費税増税も出来ない。