Paul Krugman JAN. 8, 2009 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/opinion/09krugman.html “I don’t believe it’s too late to change course, but it will be if we don’t take dramatic action as soon as possible. If nothing is done, this recession could linger for years.”
Paul Krugman: Stimulus Was ‘Too Little,’ And Now It’s Almost All Gone 08/30/2013 01:51 pm ET | Updated Dec 06, 2017 https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/30/paul-krugman-stimulus_n_3844394.html We never spent all that much money on President Obama’s stimulus, and now we’re spending almost nothing on it, and that’s a shame, according to Paul Krugman.
Stimulus arithmetic (wonkish but important)January 6, 2009 9:26 am https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/stimulus-arithmetic-wonkish-but-important/ Bit by bit we’re getting information on the Obama stimulus plan, enough to start making back-of-the-envelope estimates of impact. 0676名無しさん＠１周年2018/11/19(月) 22:43:09.55ID:zn5KNWR+0 金融緩和および公共事業こそが、ヒラリーやクリントンやオバマやクルーグマンと言ったリベラルがやった政策なんだけど。
Paul Krugman Reminds Us of the Context of Keynes's "Bury Banknotes in the Ground and Dig Them Up" Discussion http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2011/08/paul-krugman-reminds-us-of-the-context-of-keyness-bury-banknotes-in-the-ground-and-dig-them-up-discussion.html General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money: If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again… the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is. 0678名無しさん＠１周年2018/11/19(月) 22:43:45.88ID:BwHx212k0 安倍の頭を金属バットで弾き飛ばそう 0679名無しさん＠１周年2018/11/19(月) 22:43:51.51ID:zn5KNWR+0 それもクルーグマンが説明している。
[New York Times]November 4, 2010 6:01 Paul Krugman Generating Inflation Expectations https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/generating-inflation-expectations/ A number of readers have asked how the Fed can change inflation expectations when it has little or no current traction - that is, what can the Fed actually do?
The key point is that we won’t be in a liquidity trap forever. Eventually something will come along - a technology-driven investment boom, a recovery of consumer spending as debt gets paid down, whatever. At that point the economy will recover to the point where inflation starts to rise - and at that point the Fed would normally begin raising rates to choke off that inflation.
But if the Fed can promise not to raise rates at that point, to wait until inflation has risen substantially, it can affect long-term inflation expectations - which is what matters for investment. And higher long-term inflation expectations can boost the economy now.
The tricky part is, how does the Fed commit itself now to not raising rates in the future - after all, when the time comes, the economy will be in good shape, and all the Fed’s central-bankerly instincts will be to take away the punch bowl. Yet if people believe that will happen, there will be no rise in expected inflation now.
So what the Fed needs for inflation targeting is a way to tie its own hands - or, more accurately, the hands of future Fed officials. That was the whole point of my line about credibly promising to be irresponsible.
In practice, that’s really hard, especially when you have such divergent views among Fed officials themselves. The best precedent is 1933 - which was first pointed out by Peter Temin and Barrie Wigmore. 0680名無しさん＠１周年2018/11/19(月) 22:44:05.33ID:zn5KNWR+0 おまえ、スティグリッツやクルーグマンに経済学でけんか売る気かよｗｗｗ 日本人でスティグリッツやクルーグマンに経済学でけんか売れるやついないだろｗｗｗ 大学や学会そのものを否定することになりますがｗｗｗ 0681名無しさん＠１周年2018/11/19(月) 22:45:14.29ID:IzsVuiH60 バカチョン発狂中ｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗ 0682名無しさん＠１周年2018/11/19(月) 22:45:16.52ID:KCmYIHcy0 で、老後は自己責任でっか。なんだこの国。 0683名無しさん＠１周年2018/11/19(月) 22:45:26.58ID:ymVnDcP30 な、こいつらが何なのかやっとわかっただろ？ 0684名無しさん＠１周年2018/11/19(月) 22:45:27.45ID:zn5KNWR+0 「人口減少でGDPが減っている」と認めるなら、なおさらそれは「移民を受け入れればよい」と言う答えにしかならない。
