Japan "South Korea, your ship locked on a FC Radar to our patrol aircraft. This is only one step away from an attack." Korea "We don’t want this to be disclosed." J "We reject your offer." K "We didn't use the FC radar." J "We have got an evidence." K "This is a part of our routine operation" J "No, this is a violation of international agreement." K "We were just searching a North Korean wrecked fisher boat." J "You don’t need to use a FC radar in search of a distressed boat, or even to lock it on to a plane. Our patrol plane was in the air. Did the boat disapear to the sky?" K "We used a rader to find the North Korean distressed ship. However, We didn't use a FC radar." J "No, you used FC." K "Because the weather was bad, so we used all the radars." J "It was clear and quiet." K "Your patrol aircraft flew into the irradiation range just for a moment by chance." J "Your ship's FC radar was kept directed toward our patrol plane for 5 minutes." K "Since your patrol aircraft had been intimidating, we kept emitting the FC radar." J "Our patrol aircraft were just flying near Noto Peninsula." K "Why are you accusing us with a small thing like this for 7days? We think you are using anti-Korean sentiment for Abe administration’s advantage." J "We don’t need to take any consideration to such a comment. Why did your destroyer ignore the call from our patrol aircraft?" K "Because sensitivity of the radio was bad." J "Thinking of that possibility, we used three different frequencies to communicate." K "Because we heard only "Korea Coast" " J "We didn’t use such a word." K "Show the evidence that our destroyer has irradiated your patrol aircraft with FC radar." K "Japan interfeared our rescue operation with a very low-altitude flight by a patrol plane. We are disappointed by such an act by an ally." === Japan released a fottage === J "Here is the footage. The ship, which seems to be a North Korean, was right by your destroyer. So you did not need to use a radar for searching." K "We express deep regret and concern that Japan released the video with only one-sided view. Because this footage shows only a scene when a patrol aircraft swirling over the sea and the dialogue of the pilots, we can't consider this video as an objective evidence. We don’t change the fact that we didn't use the FC radar." (Choi, Korea Defense Ministry spokes women ) K "In order to back the claim, Japan should disclose the rader frequency and other objective evidences." K "Because of the noise and poor English pronounciation, we didn’t get the communication and thought you were calling a Coastal guard." ←イマココ 👀 Rock54: Caution(BBR-MD5:f70dfdc711a7c6ae6accccb939f27fbf) 0770名無しさん@1周年2018/12/29(土) 22:30:01.56ID:cTEAF9ZT0>>720 海自がココまでやるのは余程の事だろう あそこでの瀬取りは初めてじゃ無いと思う 当然アメちゃんも承知でしょ 0771名無しさん@1周年2018/12/29(土) 22:30:06.43ID:qg2Cb/2P0>>632>>682 公海じゃなくて日本EEZ内だぞ そして軍艦旗を掲げていない武装艦なんて海賊だぞ 0772名無しさん@1周年2018/12/29(土) 22:30:09.45ID:YKYuNLTX0>>742 なんか問題あるのそれ? 0773名無しさん@1周年2018/12/29(土) 22:30:12.54ID:rc6IlJsG0>>710 FCSでロックオンしたんだろ 旋回角、仰角の他に、距離を調節しないと ロックオンは出来ないから、偶然はありえない 1秒間も偶然はねえしな 1秒で何yds進むのか 0774名無しさん@1周年2018/12/29(土) 22:30:15.16ID:4xz+2Fms0 戦争すっか? ガキみたいな言い訳だな 0775名無しさん@1周年2018/12/29(土) 22:30:15.76ID:FRDymJIe0 韓国側はFCレーダー照射してないて言ってるのに日本側の勝手におたおたしてる映像じゃなんの証拠にもならないし 0776名無しさん@1周年2018/12/29(土) 22:30:22.61ID:dyXVaRpAO (・∀・;)はやく投了しなさい 0777名無しさん@1周年2018/12/29(土) 22:30:23.63ID:porBG3JZO>>737 当然たわな 0778名無しさん@1周年2018/12/29(土) 22:30:27.55ID:ZPCha6/O0 ごね得狙っての事なんだろうけど